How to get ethical approval
What ethics committees actually look for, the documents you need, and the mistakes that cause applications to be returned.
8 min read · Reviewed 2026 · Written and reviewed by Chris McGarrigle
Only your institution can grant ethical approval, and its own forms, deadlines and requirements always take precedence over any general guidance. This article helps you prepare a stronger application, not bypass one.
Most rejections are administrative rather than ethical: missing documents, vague procedures, or a data plan that does not match the consent form.
What committees are checking
Applications are assessed against a fairly predictable set of concerns.
- Informed consent: do participants understand what they are agreeing to?
- Right to withdraw: by when, and what happens to their data?
- Confidentiality and anonymisation: how, and at what point?
- Data security: where stored, who has access, how long, how destroyed?
- Risk of harm: including distress, and what you will do if it arises.
- Vulnerability: additional safeguards for anyone who needs them.
Documents to prepare
Typically a participant information sheet in plain language, a consent form, your instruments (interview schedule, questionnaire or observation protocol), recruitment materials, and a data management plan. Consistency between them matters: if the consent form promises deletion after twelve months, your data plan must say the same.
Build in the time
Review rounds take weeks and amendments take more. Collecting any data before approval is a serious academic offence, so plan the timeline backwards from your submission date.
Common mistakes
- Starting data collection before written approval.
- Information sheets written in academic register participants cannot follow.
- Promising anonymity that a small, identifiable sample makes impossible.
- Contradictions between the consent form and the data management plan.
Try this: The consistency check
- Put your information sheet, consent form and data plan side by side.
- Highlight every promise made to participants.
- Confirm each promise appears identically in all three documents.
- Rewrite anything a non-academic reader would not understand.
Do it in SuperDiss
Work through the standard requirements and get your documents consistent.
Open the Ethics workspaceStudents also ask
- How do I get ethical approval for my dissertation?
- Submit your ethics form before any data collection, with your participant information sheet, consent form, recruitment text and data management plan attached. Approval usually takes two to six weeks, so build that into your timeline.
- What are the most common reasons ethics applications are rejected?
- Inconsistency between documents, vague data storage and retention plans, unclear withdrawal rights, and recruitment routes that create pressure on participants.
- Do secondary-data dissertations need ethical approval?
- Often yes, at least as a light-touch review, because licensing, anonymity and permitted use of the dataset still need checking.
Related research: design the methodology
Choose philosophy, approach, sampling and ethics you can defend in the viva.
How to choose a methodology
A decision path from research question to methodology, plus how to write the justification examiners are looking for.
Research philosophy explained: ontology, epistemology and axiology
A clear introduction to research philosophy for dissertations: ontology, epistemology and axiology, and how they shape your methodology choices.
Qualitative vs quantitative research
The real difference between qualitative and quantitative dissertation research, and how to choose based on your question rather than your comfort zone.
Continue your dissertation journey
- Sampling explained
- Using AI ethically in your dissertation
- How to choose a methodology
- Research philosophy explained: ontology, epistemology and axiology
- Interpretivism vs positivism: which fits your dissertation?
Browse every guide in research methodology.
Read next
This guide is general educational content. Your institution's regulations, handbook and supervisor's instructions always take precedence. Where a named framework is mentioned, consult the original source text rather than relying on this summary.