SuperDiss learning resources

From first idea to research worth defending.

SuperDiss does not write the dissertation. It helps students make, connect and defend the academic decisions that create one. No sign-up, no email wall.

Write it down

Idea · problem · gap · question · objectives

Write it out

Literature · Research DNA · methods · analysis

Write it up

Argument · golden thread · viva defence

Research DNA

Make the whole study cohere.

Every methodological decision should make sense when traced back to the research question. When one strand changes, check every other strand.

Research question
Philosophy
Approach
Design
Data
Sample
Analysis
Theoretical lens
Core contribution

Interactive workbook

The 14-stage dissertation journey

01

Find your idea

Start with fascination, not a title.

Supervisor questions
  • What genuinely interests, irritates or puzzles you?
  • Why is it worth investigating now?
  • Who is affected by it?
Your task

Write a 50-word description of the problem without trying to sound academic.

02

Turn interest into a problem

Move from a broad topic to something research can examine.

Supervisor questions
  • What exactly is happening?
  • Where and for whom?
  • What is uncertain, contested or poorly understood?
Your task

Complete: “We know ___, but we do not yet understand ___.”

03

Spot the gap

Find what your study can add.

Supervisor questions
  • Is there an evidence gap?
  • A knowledge or population gap?
  • A context, method or theory gap?
  • A contradiction, policy or practice gap?
Your task

Name the gap in one sentence and explain why it matters.

04

Build the research question

Create one question that can hold the whole dissertation together.

Supervisor questions
  • Is it specific enough to answer?
  • Is it open enough to investigate?
  • Can you obtain the evidence?
  • Is it worth defending?
Your task

Draft three versions of the question, then select and justify the strongest.

05

Set aim and objectives

Translate the question into a manageable route.

Supervisor questions
  • What is the single overall aim?
  • What 3–5 objectives are genuinely distinct?
  • What evidence will each objective require?
Your task

Write your aim and no more than five objectives.

06

Read like a detective

Use literature to map a debate, not collect quotations.

Supervisor questions
  • Who agrees?
  • Who disagrees?
  • What assumptions are being made?
  • Which evidence is strongest?
  • What is missing?
Your task

Choose five core sources and write the argument connecting them.

07

Build the literature map

Organise literature around themes, tensions and schools of thought.

Supervisor questions
  • What are the key themes?
  • Which authors anchor each theme?
  • Where are the counter-claims?
  • What does each theme imply for your study?
Your task

Create three to five literature themes and explain how they relate to one another.

08

Create your Research DNA

Make every methodological decision fit the question.

Supervisor questions
  • What is your philosophy?
  • What is your approach and design?
  • What data and sample fit the question?
  • How will you analyse it?
  • What is the theoretical lens and contribution?
Your task

Complete the Research DNA chain and identify any weak link.

09

Choose and justify methodology

Explain why this is the right way to find out.

Supervisor questions
  • Why this philosophy?
  • Why qualitative, quantitative or mixed?
  • Why this design?
  • What credible alternative did you reject?
Your task

Write a 150-word methodology justification without hiding behind jargon.

10

Plan data, sample and ethics

Make the study feasible, ethical and credible.

Supervisor questions
  • What data do you actually need?
  • Who or what is the sample?
  • How will access work?
  • How will consent and confidentiality work?
  • What could go wrong?
Your task

Create a data collection plan and an ethics risk list.

11

Make sense of the data

Move from raw material to defensible findings.

Supervisor questions
  • What patterns are emerging?
  • What exceptions matter?
  • What rival explanation could account for the result?
  • Can another reader follow your analytical trail?
Your task

Write the three most important patterns you can see and one exception.

12

Write the argument

Turn chapters into one connected answer.

Supervisor questions
  • What is the claim?
  • What is the evidence?
  • What is your interpretation?
  • How does it connect to literature?
  • Why does it matter to the research question?
Your task

Take one paragraph and label its claim, evidence, interpretation and implication.

13

Test the golden thread

Check that every major decision still fits.

Supervisor questions
  • Does the question connect to the literature?
  • Does the method answer the question?
  • Do the objectives drive the analysis?
  • Do findings lead to the conclusion?
  • Is the contribution supported by evidence?
Your task

Identify the weakest connection in your dissertation and repair it.

14

Nail the defence

Prepare to explain and defend every important choice.

Supervisor questions
  • Why this question?
  • Why this literature?
  • Why this method?
  • What did you find?
  • What is original?
  • What would you change?
Your task

Write the viva question you least want to be asked — then answer it.

Golden thread audit

Test the joins.

Question ↔ gapRED · AMBER · GREEN
Question ↔ literatureRED · AMBER · GREEN
Question ↔ methodologyRED · AMBER · GREEN
Objectives ↔ dataRED · AMBER · GREEN
Objectives ↔ analysisRED · AMBER · GREEN
Findings ↔ literatureRED · AMBER · GREEN
Conclusion ↔ questionRED · AMBER · GREEN
Contribution ↔ evidenceRED · AMBER · GREEN
Viva defence

Can you defend the decisions?

What is your dissertation about in one sentence?
Why is the research question worth answering?
What is the research gap?
Why did you choose this methodology?
What is your strongest finding?
What finding surprised you?
How do your findings relate to the literature?
What is the main limitation?
What is the contribution?
What would you do differently with another six months?
Academic integrity

Use AI without outsourcing the thinking.

Read our integrity position

University regulations always take precedence.

Students remain responsible for claims, citations, data and interpretation.

Never trust an AI-generated reference without checking the original source.

Use AI to question, challenge, rehearse and provide feedback where permitted — not to replace intellectual ownership.

Don't just survive your dissertation. Actually get it.

Write it down. Write it out. Write it up. Then defend it.